{"id":1693,"date":"2013-10-25T22:14:55","date_gmt":"2013-10-26T03:14:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hilbertthm90.wordpress.com\/?p=1693"},"modified":"2022-06-21T12:35:26","modified_gmt":"2022-06-21T17:35:26","slug":"in-defense-of-gaming","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/amindformadness.com\/2013\/10\/in-defense-of-gaming\/","title":{"rendered":"In Defense of Gaming as Art"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Are video games art? <\/p>\n\n\n\n

What a bizarre question. It has been debated through the years, but I’m not sure there is anyone out there that has seriously thought about the question and is willing to defend that they are not. The debate seems over and the conclusion is that video games are art.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ebert’s Objection<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The one notable opposition is Roger Ebert, but his position boils down to a “no true Scotsman fallacy.” It is such a classic example that it should probably just start being used to illustrate what the fallacy is. He says games cannot be art. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Then when shown a game that he admits is<\/em> art he says, “But that isn’t a real<\/em> game.” <\/p>\n\n\n\n

That would be like arguing novels cannot be art by declaring any novel that could be considered art not a real<\/em> novel. It is a silly argument that doesn’t need to be taken seriously.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Are Video Games Art?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

First, we should notice that there is a “type error” (as a programmer would say) in the question. No one would think “Are books art?” is a properly phrased question. <\/p>\n\n\n\n